Support this site Could you please provide details of a more accurate scientific method of dating which can tell us the age of the earth more accurately than current scientific methods.For example, if you do not accept dendrochronology as an accurate method or radio carbon dating which method do you accept and and on what grounds.
This water dropping into a cylinder - explanation to refute dating was quite "simple" indeed. beforehand there were others who found 2.61 and 3 mill..... at least one would then assume with some confidence it should have occured between 1 and 4 million years ago... All dating methods are based on assumptions about age, not measurements of age.
Of course, the further you go back in history the greater your statistical errors will be... And you can make the result come out to anything you like depending on the assumptions that you make.
And while we call the assumptions behind the long-age evolutionary creation myth into question, we also provide an alternative.
We point to biblical history as reliable and accurate, and we do our science within that framework.
CMI provides new articles 6 days a week, 52 weeks a year.
Will you consider a small gift to support this site?
There is no 'scientific' method that could give us that knowledge.
By the same method we know the age of the earth from the histroy provided in the Bible, which is accurate and reliable.
It seems to me that while creation ministries likes to question current scientific assumptions, they put forward no answers that are not subject to the same, if not more, criticism.
Hello John, It's not "science" but "evolutionary science" that we are talking about here.
See for example 101 evidences for a young of the earth and the universe.